Third Overall in Fall National LM Pairs – Denver, 11/19/05
Playing with Ed Schulte of Tampa, we scored a 69% game in the final session of the 2-day national championship Life Master Pairs in Denver, to rise from deep in the pack to third overall. The following hand contributed to our excellent score.
I held ªKJ97653 ©A7 ¨J §K104. In second position I opened the bidding with 1ª, partner replied 2© (game-forcing), I rebid 2ª, and he rebid 2NT. Now what?
Although I usually have a 6-card suit for my 2ª rebid, I could have a 5-card spade suit when rebidding 2NT may be unappealing and I don't have enough extra strength or extra length for a rebid at the 3-level. It is used as a catch-all rebid on weak hands such as: ªAQJ75 ©754 ¨KQ5 §74 or ªAQ976 ©AQ ¨9764 §J4.
But, before I rebid my spades again, I should consider that the auction is reaching high levels quickly. If I rebid 3ª, it can be very hard to agree upon a heart fit and have room for slam investigation. My spade suit is missing 3 honors, and it might be right to play in hearts. Is this a good time to bid 3©? I don’t think so – I think it would be a major distortion of my major suit distributions and might put us into the wrong major suit. Should I bid 3§ to save bidding space, therefore allow partner to either repeat the hearts or show spade support? That is much more appealing than bidding 3©. Saving bidding space in auctions like this can be very helpful in reaching the best trump fit. Still, if I rebid 3§ partner may not let me play in a 7-1 spade fit, when he has 4-card club support. It would not be a bad risk to bid 3§, but I felt it was more important to mention my good 7-card suit again. I bid 3ª.
Partner now cue bid 4§ which is a cue bid supporting spades. The cue bid shows slam interest and the club ace-- it can’t be a shortness cue bid due to his 2NT rebid. That is very good news. What is your next bid?
You could cue bid 4¨ which guarantees either 1st or 2nd round control (ace, king, void or singleton), or you could bid 4NT (1430 Key Card Blackwood). This is matchpoints, and overtricks are very important. I had hopes of discarding my losing diamond on partner’s long hearts, and I figured that a cue bid of 4¨ would discourage a diamond lead. When making a bid like this, you also need to consider the likelihood of losing the ability to bid 4NT on your next bid. I judged that partner was very likely to rebid 4 of a major suit, so I would not lose my ability to bid 4NT, and that even if he continued bidding at the 5-level, that I would probably be able to handle the auction with cue-bids. I considered the lead-inhibiting value of a 4¨ bid worth the risk of not being able to bid 4NT on my next turn.
Over my 4¨ cue bid, partner cue bid 4© and I bid 4NT. Partner bid 5ª showing 2 key cards with the spade queen, and I signed off in 6ª. The opening lead was the ©2. How do you plan the play?
| Dummy |
| ªAQ |
| ©K109643 |
| ¨Q87 |
| §A3 |
| Declarer |
| ªKJ97653 |
| ©A7 |
| ¨J |
| §K104 |
| Opening Lead: Heart 2 |
| Contract: 6 Spades |
You count 7 spade tricks, 2 hearts, and 2 clubs. If hearts break 3-2, then you can draw trump and set up the long hearts, using the club ace as an entry to the good hearts to take all 13 tricks. But that ©2 opening lead looks very menacing. If the hearts are breaking 4-1, then you cannot draw trump and set up the heart suit--you lack entries and will end up with 2 losers. You can ruff a club in dummy to set up a 12th trick, but after trumping in dummy you will still have trouble getting off dummy to draw the trumps, and may still lose a heart ruff and a diamond trick. What is your best line of play?
Based upon the opening lead, I decided that it was very likely that hearts were dividing 4-1, so I took the only line of play that should make the contract. I trumped the third club with the spade ace, and I overtook the spade queen with the king. For my line of play to work, I needed the spades to either divide 2-2 (42%) or for them to be 3-1 with the 10 being singleton (an additional 12%).
Normally a 3-2 heart break (68%) would be a better line of play than my 54% play in the spade suit, but considering the opening lead, my line of play was much more likely. And I was right.
And, I got a bonus. After I drew trump, I kept leading trump and squeezed my RHO, who couldn't protect both the ©QJ and ¨AK. This was the end position:
| North | ||
| ª | ||
| ©K109 | ||
| ¨ | ||
| West | § | East |
| ª | ª-- | |
| © | ©QJ | |
| ¨965 | ¨A | |
| § | South | § |
| ª3 | ||
| ©7 | ||
| ¨J | ||
| § |
On the lead of the ª3, dummy discarded a small heart, and East had no winning option. If he discarded a heart, I would take the last 2 tricks with dummy's hearts. In fact, East discarded the diamond ace, hoping that his partner held the diamond jack. I then cashed the diamond jack and heart king, to score all 13 tricks. We got 72 ½ matchpoints on the board, out of a maximum of 77.
I don’t think this hand is anything spectacular, but it is a good example of good solid bidding and play. You have to make good plays like this to have a chance to place high in major national championships. We won 70.31 masterpoints for finishing third overall. I won over 116 masterpoints in the tournament.
This was the entire hand:
| North | ||
| ªAQ | ||
| ©K109643 | ||
| ¨Q87 | ||
| West | §A3 | East |
| ª42 | ª108 | |
| ©2 | ©QJ85 | |
| ¨965432 | ¨AK10 | |
| §Q865 | South | §J972 |
| ªKJ97653 | ||
| ©A7 | ||
| ¨J | ||
| §K104 |